<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Contextualization Conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reformergent.org/2008/04/02/the-contextualization-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/04/02/the-contextualization-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Version 3.0</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/04/02/the-contextualization-conundrum/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reformergent.org/?p=46#comment-69</guid>
		<description>cool. i think another element is that Phil is a pastor and I am a missionary and we probably both come from different angles with different concerns.

but its an important argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool. i think another element is that Phil is a pastor and I am a missionary and we probably both come from different angles with different concerns.</p>
<p>but its an important argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
