<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Marriage Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/</link>
	<description>Version 3.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Blundell</title>
		<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Blundell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>totally agree!
marriage is sacred - but only when the government keeps out.
marriage should be between a man and a woman and God - not man, woman, God and Uncle Sam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally agree!<br />
marriage is sacred &#8211; but only when the government keeps out.<br />
marriage should be between a man and a woman and God &#8211; not man, woman, God and Uncle Sam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Morrell</title>
		<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Morrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Tony Campolo advocated something similar years ago–let government be in the civil unions business and let churches be in the marriage business–however each church and communion envisions marriage. This solution won’t please the Christendom crowd, but it makes a ton of sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Campolo advocated something similar years ago–let government be in the civil unions business and let churches be in the marriage business–however each church and communion envisions marriage. This solution won’t please the Christendom crowd, but it makes a ton of sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I love this!  But as Ryan said, it does make too much sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this!  But as Ryan said, it does make too much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reformergent.org/2008/03/26/the-marriage-solution/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll never work.  It makes too much sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll never work.  It makes too much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
